Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 5, 1999
On 99-11-05 BugScan reporter wrote:
Some comments on some of the bugreports.
> Package: apache-common (main)
> Maintainer: Johnie Ingram <johnie@debian.org>
> [STRATEGY] Maintainer will have this fixed by Oct. 30.
> 45428 apache-common: mod_mime.so depends on /etc/apache/mime.types
We have 8. November 1999 and so more then one week has been gone then
the estimated date for the fix. When will this be fixed?
> Package: apache-ssl (non-US)
> Maintainer: Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>
> 49157 apache-ssl: Can't build (SSL patch failed)
When will this get fixed? Is somebody already working on a fix?
> Package: apt (main)
> Maintainer: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>
> 46096 apt: pb upgrading libgtk-1.2.5
> [FIX] Fixed in cvs.
> 46537 apt-get update with apt-cdrom broken
> [FIX] Fixed in cvs.
> 46857 apt: If source URI contains password, the password is printed on the screen during fetches
> [FIX] Fixed in cvs.
> 47557 apt: internal error
> [FIX] Fixed in cvs.
> 48392 apt-get install libc6- libc6 will remove 160 package without questioning
We have the fixes in the cvs, so how long will it take till we have a
new release?
> Package: asis (main)
> Maintainer: Samuel Tardieu <sam@debian.org>
> 49180 Missing files
According to the BTS this bug has been fixed in version 3.12p-2. Can
please somebody confirm this, that this bug report can be closed?
> Package: bash (main)
> Maintainer: Guy Maor <maor@debian.org>
> 48911 bash: please remove sparc from libc5 compat list
Seems to be trivial to fix. Guy, is it allowed to NMU this?
> Package: bigloo (main)
> Maintainer: Craig Brozefsky <craig@red-bean.com>
> 46040 [PATCH] compilation on sparc, cleanup, etc
> [STRATEGY] It appears that a new .diff.gz was uploaded, but it was never
> recompiled on the original arch.
Could somebody please make the necessary recompilation to fix this bug?
> Package: cecilia (non-free)
> Maintainer: Marco Budde <Budde@tu-harburg.de>
> [REMOVE] No source available, so we can't fix this. Also hasn't been updated
> upstream in over a year it seems.
> 44747 cecilia: `Error: couldn't execute "/usr/lib/cecilia/files/csound_linux2.0.x"'
Hm, I would suggest removing this package till there's a fix for the
bug.
> Package: cmucl (main)
> Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org>
> 46675 Problem with newer glibc's and CMUCL
> [STRATEGY] Fix is in bugreport, but maintainer hasn't uploaded it??
Has the fixed version be installed in the archive now or is it still in
incoming?
> Package: console-data (main)
> Maintainer: Yann Dirson <dirson@debian.org>
> 48940 console-data: apt-get upgrade dies
According to the BTS this bug has been fixed. Can somebody confirm this?
> 48998 console-data: install error
This bug looks more like a bug in debconf. Could the maintainer of
debconf confirm this?
> Package: console-tools (main)
> Maintainer: Yann Dirson <dirson@debian.org>
> 48963 console-tools debconf stuff buggy (maybe bug in debconf)
According to the BTS this bug has also been fixed. Confirmation?
> 49158 console-tools; error while upgrading
It seems that this bug is trivial to fix. Yann, when do you plan to fix
this one?
> Package: darxite (main)
> Maintainer: Ben C. Hendrickson <bhendrickson@usa.net>
> 48846 Downloading multiple files via html causes data corruption
This bug is over one week old and there's no reaction from the
maintainer in the BTS. Is he on holiday or busy?
> Package: ddd-smotif (contrib)
> Maintainer: Alexander Yukhimets <alexy@debian.org>
> [REMOVE] This package is no longer needed and can be removed.
> 34802 ddd-smotif: Generate core-dumps after start
Could the archive-maintainers please remove it ASAP?
> Package: debconf (main)
> Maintainer: Joey Hess <joeyh@master.debian.org>
> 48979 Console-data cannot be installed due to problem in debconf or perl or...
Same as bug #48998.
> Package: debian-keyring (contrib)
> Maintainer: James Troup <keyring-maint@debian.org>
> 43536 debian-keyring: Non self-signed keys
This bug is extremly important for us. Can the maintainers with non-self
signed keys fix this ASAP? We should fix this till we release a new
version.
> Package: debiandoc-sgml (main)
> Maintainer: Ardo van Rangelrooij <ardo@debian.org>
> 49136 debiandoc-sgml should depend on libi18n-langtags-perl, but doesn't
This bug can easily be fixed by a recompilation, so that it depends on
libi18n-langtags-perl.
> Package: deliver (main)
> Maintainer: Scott K. Ellis <scott@debian.org>
> 49200 deliver: cannot log error messages
Is this just a problem of not correct permissions or what is the
problem?
> Package: dump (main)
> Maintainer: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
> 49192 dump: uses /etc/dumpdates instead of /var/lib/dumpdates
According to the BTS this is just a misconfiguration while compiling it.
So a recompilation with correct configuration should fix this one.
> Package: dwww (main)
> Maintainer: Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com>
> 49072 dwww_1.4.3.5-1.1(unstable): doesn't delete debian/files
Argh, extremely easy to fix. When will there be the new release or is it
allowed to NMU?
> Package: dx (main)
> Maintainer: Konstantinos Margaritis <markos@debian.org>
> 48164 Cannot coexist with current LessTif package.
> [STRATEGY] Problems with source during nmu attempt(see bug report)
Hm, can't this package be removed if we don't find a solution for the
bug?
> Package: elks-libc (main)
> Maintainer: Juan Cespedes <cespedes@debian.org>
> 48706 elks-libc: upgrade error overwrite /usr/lib/bcc/i86/rules.186
A fix seems to be to remove /usr/lib/bcc/i86/rules.186 from the package
as it is in bcc on which elks-libc depends.
> Package: emacs19 (main)
> Maintainer: Mark W. Eichin <eichin@thok.org>
> 49065 emacs19: info page still resides in /usr/info - emacs19.postinst fails
According to the BTS this bug has been fixed.
> Package: flick-dev (main)
> Maintainer: Raphael Bossek <bossekr@debian.org>
> 49079 flick-dev: apt-get can't install flick-dev
A possible solution would be to remove
/usr/share/man/man5/hosts_access.5.gz from the package.
> Package: freeciv-xaw (main)
> Maintainer: Lalo Martins <lalo@webcom.com>
> 48214 freeciv-xaw: bad symlink
The last mail from the maintainer is now about three weeks old. When
will we get a fixed version?
> Package: ftp.debian.org (pseudo)
> Maintainer: Guy Maor <ftpmaster@debian.org>
> 38599 packages which should be moved to the base section
> 41274 Please remove the old netcdf packages
> 43889 An experimental version of gnus was uploaded by mistake into main
> 46388 NO 2.1r3 M68K CDs: trn depends
> 47708 Please move cgi-scripts to project/orphaned
> 49068 'poc' should be removed from the archive. New package 'objc-poc' replaces 'poc'.
> 49090 ftp.debian.org: please remove aumix-alsa
When will the FTP-master become active and fix those bugs? Or do they
need some help for maintaing the FTP-Server?
> Package: g++ (main)
> Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers <gcc@packages.debian.org>
> 48530 g++ [alpha]: internal compiler error building open-amulet
The bug is now about one week old and there seems to be no reaction
from the maintainers. When does this important package gets fixed?
> Package: gaim (main)
> Maintainer: Robert S. Edmonds <stu@novare.net>
> 46487 Subject: /usr/include/gnome.h doesn't find gnomesupport.h
Can this bug just be closed or do we need a solution for it?
> Package: gcc (main)
> Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers <gcc@packages.debian.org>
> 48527 gcc [alpha]: error compiling fweb
This is also one week old and there's no reaction to it. This is release
critical and also a important package, so I woud recommend finding a
solution soon.
> Package: geomview (main)
> Maintainer: Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>
> 49016 geomview_1.6.1.9-10(unstable): doesn't delete debian/files
Easy to fix, when will the fixed version be uploaded? Or should somebody
NMU it?
> Package: giram-gnome-mesa (main)
> Maintainer: Carlos Barros <cbf@debian.org>
> 48292 giram-gnome-mesa: Missing Tutorial.gz
According to the BTS it looks pretty easy to fix.
> Package: gnome-apt (main)
> Maintainer: Apt Packaging Team <apt@packages.debian.org>
> 44427 gnome-apt: Broken Package
Can't we remove this package if it doesn't get fixed?
> Package: gnome-help (main)
> Maintainer: James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org>
> 48723 help-browser crashes on first startup
According to the BTS this bug has been closed.
> Package: gpart (main)
> Maintainer: David L. Coe <david.coe@someotherplace.org>
> 46101 gpart_0.1d-1(unstable): unnecessary arch switch; arch specific?
When will the fixed version be uploaded and installed into the archive?
> Package: gpasman (non-US)
> Maintainer: Michael Meskes <meskes@debian.org>
> 43061 gpasman segfaults when opening database
Could please be a tag [STRATEGY] Can be removed if not fixed be added to
this package?
> Package: gs (main)
> Maintainer: Marco Pistore <pistore@di.unipi.it>
> 41570 Can not handle kanji font PS
> [STRATEGY] There is a patch in the report
Marco, when do you apply the patch and upload a fixed version? Or should
somebody make a NMU for you?
> Package: gsl (main)
> Maintainer: Michael J. Booth <booth@debian.org>
> 42116 gsl-histogram double counts last input
> [STRATEGY] Upstream fixed in on August 5, but a new package was never made
Michael, when will the fixed version be uploaded or can we make a NMU to
fix the bug?
> Package: hostname (main)
> Maintainer: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>
> 48850 hostname 2.05 conflict with nis over /bin/domainname
> 49009 hostname: conflict with nis package
Which package is more importatn nis or hostname? After this decision has
been made it should probably be easy to fix those two bugs.
> Package: html2ps (main)
> Maintainer: Stephen Zander <gibreel@debian.org>
> [REMOVE] Drop this package, htmldoc is a much better alternative
> 46275 html2ps; html2ps does not work with new perl
Okay, can it be removed from the archive then?
> Package: htp (main)
> Maintainer: Jonathon D. Nelson <nels0988@tc.umn.edu>
> 48633 htp: No up to date sources for htp
Can we remove the package if we don't get a fix for potato till the
freeze?
> Package: iceconf (main)
> Maintainer: Jules Bean <jules@debian.org>
> 39251 iceconf: iceconf uses old workspace commands
> [HELP] Could be fixed now...?
When will this bug get fixed?
> Package: lapack (main)
> Maintainer: James A. Treacy <treacy@debian.org>
> 48661 lapack: doesn't build from source
It seems that we first need to inspect if the bug is in lapack or g77.
After this we can work on a fix for it.
> Package: ldso (main)
> Maintainer: David Engel <david@debian.org>
> 48539 ldso_1.9.11-5_alpha.deb fails to install
According to the BTS it seems that this bug has been fixed. So can it be
closed now?
> Package: lha (non-free)
> Maintainer: Steve McIntyre <stevem@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> 48748 lha has no license
Can't we remove the package if we don't get a proper license for it?
> Package: libapache-mod-perl (main)
> Maintainer: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
> 45753 libapache-mod-perl: Doesn't build on Alpha
Seems pretty easy to fix?
> Package: libcgi-perl (main)
> Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
> 49189 cannot purge libcgi-perl
Deciding from the information in the BTS, I would say it's pretty easy
to fix.
> Package: libesd0 (main)
> Maintainer: Andrew Feinberg <agf@debian.org>
> 49086 Platform detection wrong on powerpc
Looks like it has been fixed. Can this be confirmed?
> Package: libgd-perl (non-free)
> Maintainer: Scott K. Ellis <scott@debian.org>
> 49108 libgd-perl: please build new version (uses PNG) so it can go in main
Has this bug been fixed? Otherwise could somebody please fix it and make
a NMU? (NMU is allowed according to the BTS)
> Package: libreadlineg2 (main)
> Maintainer: Guy Maor <maor@debian.org>
> 39907 lftp dumps core
Has this one been fixed?
> Package: lynx (main)
> Maintainer: Christian Hudon <chrish@debian.org>
> 46021 lynx on alpha exits immediately with interrupt 15, is useless
The last message about this bug in the BTS is over a month old. Can
someone please take care of it and try to find a solution?
> Package: manpages-de (main)
> Maintainer: Martin Schulze <joey@debian.org>
> 48561 translations of manpages and manpages-xx packages
According to the BTS this one has been fixed.
> Package: manpages-dev (main)
> Maintainer: Nicolás Lichtmaier <nick@debian.org>
> 46792 setreuid(2) contains invalid security information
According to the BTS this is a bug in libc6-doc. Can we reassign it
please?
> Package: mercury (main)
> Maintainer: Tyson Dowd <trd@cs.mu.oz.au>
> 48664 mercury: can't build from source
Could somebody please check if this one has now been fixed?
> 49160 Patch for Sparc compilation
New version which should fix this has been uploaded according to the
BTS.
> Package: mgetty-fax (main)
> Maintainer: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>
> 47439 pre-removal script fails
A patch for this is in the BTS. Philip, could you please apply it?
> Package: mpsql (non-free)
> Maintainer: Michael Meskes <meskes@debian.org>
> 48169 Cannot coexist with current LessTif package.
Seems to be fixed. Can someone confirm?
> Package: mrtg (main)
> Maintainer: Dermot Bradley <bradley@debian.org>
> 49089 mrtg depends on libsnmp-session-perl (>= 0.74)
According to the BTS this one is fixed.
> Package: mutt (main)
> Maintainer: Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>
> 48851 mutt: recompile against newer slang
> 49215 mutt: Depends: slang1 (< 1.3) but 1.3.9-1 is installed
> 49231 mutt: Broken Dependancies
Seems to be pretty easy to fix.
> Package: ntop (main)
> Maintainer: Joey Hess <joeyh@master.debian.org>
> 48202 ntop: no images, display local index.html, no mapage
Over one week old without a reaction from the maintainer.
> Package: oskit (main)
> Maintainer: Ed Boraas <ed@debian.org>
> 43872 oskit: i586-oskit-gcc forks endlessly
Over two months old without a reaction from the maintainer. So may I
suggest adding a tag STRATEGY Can be removed if not fixed?
> Package: perl (main)
> Maintainer: Darren Stalder <torin@daft.com>
> 44033 Perl exits with "Illegal instruction" when executing
Can we please close this bug report?
> Package: plugger (contrib)
> Maintainer: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>
> 47397 plugger: Plugger don't work
I think somebody needs to carefully inspect the problem.
> Package: proftpd (main)
> Maintainer: Johnie Ingram <johnie@debian.org>
> [STRATEGY] Maintainer will have this fixed by Oct. 30.
> 46695 proftpd: Still configured anonymous access when I answered "no" to the debconf dialog.
> 49170 proftpd_1.2.0pre9-1(unstable): compile error with have_sendfile
Has this bug been fixed as estimated or not?
> Package: quake2 (non-free)
> Maintainer: Michael Beattie <mike@omnic.dhis.org>
> 45985 quake2: After correcting mouse and mouse unconfig in vga.config, I get segfault loading ref_soft.so
Could we please downgrade this bug? This package is non-free.
> Package: quota (main)
> Maintainer: Heiko Schlittermann <heiko@lotte.sax.de>
> 41753 quota: repquota and quotacheck segfault
> 47222 quota: edquota - confusing
> 47718 edquota will not allow soft or hard limits above 4194303 blocks
Heiko, when will these get fixed? Do you need some help?
> Package: radiusd-cistron (main)
> Maintainer: Norbert Veber <nveber@debian.org>
> 48089 radiusd-cistron: new upstream version available
As Norbert Veber is also the maintainer of xinetd and Josip Rodin just
made a NMU of xinetd, I would say that Norbert is MIA. So could somebody
please make a NMU to fix this bug?
> Package: raidtools2 (main)
> Maintainer: Pekka Aleksi Knuutila <pa@debian.org>
> 48707 raidtools2: raidtools2 doesn't use update-modules
Seems pretty easy to be fix?
> Package: revtex (non-free)
> Maintainer: Michael A. Miller <mmiller@debian.org>
> 48691 revtex: /usr/share/texmf/doc in revtex conflicts with tetex-base_1.0-5_all
According to the BTS it looks like this one is pretty easy to fix.
> Package: rosegarden (main)
> Maintainer: Will Lowe <lowe@debian.org>
> 48631 rosegarden: Source for rosegarden 2.1-4 not in archive?
Seems to be fixed according to the BTS.
> Package: roxen (main)
> Maintainer: Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@debian.org>
> 46063 roxen is not stopped correctly by /etc/cron.weekly/roxen
If I understand the problem correctly, we only need to fix the script
/etc/cron.weekly/roxen to work correctly.
> Package: rscheme (main)
> Maintainer: Rob Browning <osiris@cs.utexas.edu>
> 47774 rscheme_0.7.2-2(unstable): Syntax error in m68k specific code
Easy to resolve.
> Package: ruari-diff (main)
> Maintainer: James Troup <jjtroup@comp.brad.ac.uk>
> 30399 ruari-diff: Fix for glibc2.1
A Patch for this is available in the BTS.
> Package: sdr (main)
> Maintainer: Chu-yeon Park <kokids@debian.org>
> 43755 sdr wont compile, still requires files not present on a Debian system
Looks like it has been fixed according to the BTS.
> Package: sgml-tools (main)
> Maintainer: Sven Rudolph <sr1@inf.tu-dresden.de>
> 44743 sgml-tools: unable to purge configuation files
Should be fixable by changing the postinst-script.
> Package: slashem (main)
> Maintainer: Peter Makholm <peter@makholm.net>
> 48941 slashem upgrade fails if /var/games/slashem does not exists
Seems to be fixed accordin to the BTS.
> Package: smail (main)
> Maintainer: Soenke Lange <soenke@escher.north.de>
> 48614 smail: postinst leaves MTA broken if xinetd is in use
Soenke, when do you fix this one? Or do you need some help for fixing
it?
> Package: swish++ (main)
> Maintainer: Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com>
> 38173 swish++ segfaults with libc6 2.1
> 43417 swish++: Does not compile and is not up to date.
Jim, are you working a new package or do you need some help to get it
done?
> Package: sxid (main)
> Maintainer: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
> 48193 crashes when it is running from root
Needs are carefull inspection for fixing.
> Package: termcap-compat (main)
> Maintainer: Christian Hudon <chrish@debian.org>
> 48747 termcap-compat: doesn't build from source
Could this package be compiled with the normal gcc or not? If not, I
think fixing the package would be the best solution.
> Package: tin (non-free)
> Maintainer: Paul Haggart <phaggart@debian.org>
> 46570 tin: rtin crashes
> 48196 tin: tin claims .uk is an invalid top-level-domain
> 49012 tin: tin: Error: Bad address in From: header.
Hm, there's no reaction from the maintainer about the bug reports. Is he
on holiday or just to busy?
> Package: watchdog (main)
> Maintainer: Johnie Ingram <johnie@debian.org>
> [STRATEGY] Maintainer will have this fixed by Oct. 30.
> 46082 watchdog: watchdog - unexpected shutdowns
Has it been fixed as estimated?
> Package: wdg-html-reference (non-free)
> Maintainer: Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar@debian.org>
> 46517 wdg-html-reference: Many links should be internalised.
According to the BTS it looks like the bug has been fixed.
> Package: wmaker (main)
> Maintainer: Chris McKillop <cdm@debian.org>
> 41434 Window Maker 0.60.0 "assertion failed"
> [HELP] Any help is welcome, preferably patches.
Is the bug still in version 0.61 of wmaker?
> Package: wmmail (main)
> Maintainer: Marcelo E. Magallon <mmagallo@debian.org>
> 44569 wmmail: wmmail: defaults domain HC!@HC!@card/GNUstep/Defaults/WMMail corrupted
When will this get fixed?
> Package: wn (main)
> Maintainer: Jean Pierre LeJacq <jplejacq@quoininc.com>
> 42143 wn: cron.daily/wn recurses infinitely and gives a segment violation
> [STRATEGY] Maintainer promised to fix this.
When will the maintainer fix this?
> Package: xinvaders (non-free)
> Maintainer: Nicolás Lichtmaier <nick@debian.org>
> 49018 xinvaders: Error during installation: No such file or directory
Easy to resolve.
> Package: xmcpustate (main)
> Maintainer: Thimo Neubauer <thimo@debian.org>
> 48995 xmcpustate_3-5(unstable): build problem: -m486
Seems to be fixed.
> Package: yagirc (main)
> Maintainer: Ole J. Tetlie <olet@debian.org>
> 48093 yagirc depends on non-existed library libjpegg6a
When will the maintainer recompile and fix it? Or is it allowed to NMU
it?
> Package: zsh (main)
> Maintainer: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
> 48483 zsh: TRAPEXIT causes seg fault
> [FIX] Fixed in version 2.99.51.52pre3-1
Can this bug then be closed, please?
Ciao
Christian
--
********************************************************************
* Christian Kurz Debian Developer/QA-Team *
* Use Debian - a free Operating System *
********************************************************************
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 5, 1999
- From: Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 5, 1999
- From: Raphael Hertzog <rhertzog@p200.hrnet.fr>
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 5, 1999
- From: Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 5, 1999
- From: David Coe <david@someotherplace.org>
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 5, 1999
- From: Jean Pierre LeJacq <jplejacq@quoininc.com>
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 5, 1999
- From: Roland Rosenfeld <roland@spinnaker.de>
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 5, 1999
- From: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 5, 1999
- From: Brian Almeida <bma@debian.org>
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 5, 1999
- From: Chris McKillop <cdm@debian.org>
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 5, 1999
- From: Torsten Werner <twerner@intercomm.de>