Re: ITP: hanterm, hanterm-fonts-johab
Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu> writes:
> > 1) hanterm
> >
> > Description: Hangul terminal for XFree86
> > This is fixed Hanterm for XFree86.
>
> It is probably not specific to XFree86. Doesn't it work on other
> implementations of the X Window System?
In fact, this package is "hanterm-xfree86", a forked version of
hanterm.
hanterm is a modified xterm, an old software created in 1991. But few
years later it has lost the sync with xterm because of the poor
maintenance. "hanterm-xfree86" was made by patching "XFree86's xterm"
using hanterm code (in 1997, IIRC). Most of the Linux users use this
hanterm, since it's less buggy than the original one.
hanterm-xfree86 is surely gcc and Linux specific. But I heard that
there were a few of people which use hanterm-xfree86 on Solaris.
> > Feature:
> > * Support ANSI colors.
>
> xterm has done this for quite a while as well.
The original hanterm (which is based on the old xterm) does not.
> > * Auto hangeul font type detect. (johab,ks,johab884)
>
> I don't understand what you mean by this feature. Can you elaborate?
The standard Korean X font encoding is "ksc5601.1987-0", but "johab-1"
font was designed for Hanterm. (One advantage is small size, so it's
usable in the low-memory X terminals.) "johabs-1", "johabsh-1" and
"johab844-1" (884 is a typo) are variants of "johab-1".
With the old (and stupid) hanterm, users should have to specify the
type of the Hangul font, if it's not "johab[s[h]]-1".
> > * Right side scrollbar.
>
> xterm has done this for quite a while as well.
Likewise, the old hanterm does not.
Anyway I agree that these "features" is not suitable in the package
description.
> > * and so on.
> > .
> > Hanterm is xterm replacement. It is supporting Hangul input/output.
> > Although it uses significantly more memory, you must use it for
> > hangul input and output so far.
>
> I assume this means that there is no other terminal emulator program with
> Hangul support? If so, once there is you'd have to edit your package
> description. It is probably better to confine your package description to
> remarks about your own package, so it's not rendered incorrect by the
> actions of others. :)
rxvt and eterm (but from 0.9.x version) support Korean through i18n.
Thus, this description is wrong.
> > This package is optimized for linux and especially, Debian GNU/Linux.
> > Someday, hanterm will replace xterm (or rxvt) with hagul input methods
> > server. Someday? :-)
>
> I don't feel this kind of commentary is appropriate in a package
> description.
>
> Can I suggest this description instead?
>
> Description: X terminal emulator with Hangul support
> hanterm is a replacement for xterm that supports Hangul input and output.
> .
> For hanterm to work properly, some Hangul fonts must be available; the
> xfonts-johab package must be installed on the machines running the X
> servers on which the hanterm clients run or on a machine providing font
> services to those X servers.
Um. But hanterm does not depend on xfont-johab. Hanterm supports the
standard ksc5601.1987-0 encoding.
> Finally, please look into supporting the x-terminal-emulator virtual
> package and alternative; see the xterm 3.3.5-1 package for an example.
It already does.
> > 2) hanterm-fonts-johab
> >
> > Description: Hangul johab fonts. for hanterm* and emacs19-ko.
> > This is KAIST Johab fonts. This fonts is used for Hanterm and other Hang=
> ul
> > (Korean) input/output support applications.
>
> Any BDF fonts should probably be repackaged into an xfonts-johab package.
> I'm not familiar with the emacs19-ko package so I cannot comment on what
> kind of fonts it uses.
>
> Also please consider packaging any X font package using the guidelines
> posted to the debian-x mailing list. Recent versions of debhelper have a
> tool called dh_installxfonts which helps with this.
I agree.
--
Changwoo Ryu
Reply to: