Re: Name clash lsh
Roland Rosenfeld <roland@spinnaker.de> wrote:
> I don't think that too many users already use lsh, which seems to be
> true, as the popularity contest tells us:
>
> Package Vote Old Recent Unknown
> lsh 2 17 5 0
How did you and I get different results from the popularity contest?
> I know, all this is very ugly (why did the author of the secure lsh
> use such a common name?), but if lsh becomes a real ssh replacement
> some time, I would really prefer at least the lsh binary to be named
> lsh to be compatible with other systems (which is needed when we want
> to use lsh like rsh/ssh for example in combination with CVS,
> rsync,...).
We could convince the author of secure lsh to rename the project before it is
well known/to late.
--
I consume, therefore I am
Reply to: