Re: Name clash lsh
Edward Betts <edward@debian.org> wrote:
>> Package Vote Old Recent Unknown
>> lsh 2 17 5 0
> How did you and I get different results from the popularity contest?
I referred to "Popularity Contest Results as of Wed Oct 20 13:07:44
CDT 1999" from my cache.
>> I know, all this is very ugly (why did the author of the secure lsh
>> use such a common name?), but if lsh becomes a real ssh replacement
>> some time, I would really prefer at least the lsh binary to be
>> named lsh to be compatible with other systems (which is needed when
>> we want to use lsh like rsh/ssh for example in combination with
>> CVS, rsync,...).
> We could convince the author of secure lsh to rename the project
> before it is well known/to late.
This would be a nice alternative. Please try it.
Tschoeeee
Roland
--
* roland@spinnaker.de * http://www.spinnaker.de/ *
Reply to: