[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Poor failure recovery

Presumably the maintainers of said programs should be the ones to do
that, not I.

Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 06:02:32PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > I want to know why we don't have any statically-linked essential
> > utilities on a standard install.  Shell, cat, cp, ls, mv, rm, fsck,
> > etc.
> because (even after the lengthy flamewar on this topic about a
> month or so ago) nobody has bothered to make packages containing
> statically-linked versions of these programs.
> feel free to make a difference. nobody else who cared about static bins
> has bothered so far.
> craig
> --
> craig sanders

John Goerzen   Linux, Unix consulting & programming   jgoerzen@complete.org |
Developer, Debian GNU/Linux (Free powerful OS upgrade)       www.debian.org |
The 24,396,265th prime number is 460,832,149.

Reply to: