Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

> Or are you saying something else?

I was merely pointing out the irony of one of Craig's packages
not enabling the daemon by default.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality
  - From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality
  - From: eichin@thok.org (Mark W. Eichin)
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality
  - From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality
  - From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality
  - From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality
  - From: Francois Gurin <matrix@spic.net>
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality
  - From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality
  - From: Raul Miller <raul@usatoday.com>
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality
  - From: Raul Miller <raul@usatoday.com>