Re: Deficiencies in Debian
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 05:54:00PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> "Too few" is a pretty vague number.
Indeed. "Too few" actually is no number at all, it's a comparison.
> What is your accepted rate of bug closings?
One that makes the bug count decrease, or at least constant.
> I maintain that bugs are being closed, but new bugs are being
> introduced just as rapidly.
No, new bugs are being introduced faster.
> According to http://master.debian.org/~wakkerma/bugs/ for Sep 12, we
> opened 3 new bugs and closed 1.
On Sep 14: closed 4, opened 3. This is how it should be.
I can't check the actual opened bugs now since they are not yet in the
BTS web pages, but some of the older RC bugs could easily be fixed in
an hour or two.
> packages listed above, none of the other so-called Release Critical Bugs
> is really release critical
The definition of release critical bug is the following: "fix the bug or
risk either removal of the package from the distribution, or postponing
of the release".
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % gaia@iki.fi % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
""
(John Cage)
Reply to: