[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: usr/man vs usr/share/man?



On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 01:42:02PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> > To the best of my knowledge, no, it is not on hold. The main fracas over
> > /usr/doc vs. /usr/share/doc was that during the transition, packages
> > would be using both locations, and users would not know where to look.
> 
> No it wasn't. That was a minor side issue. Two words: incremental upgrades.

Didn't we come up with a good and reasonable solution to that problem?  =p

-- 
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>             Debian GNU/Linux developer
GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC  44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77  8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
<Culus> Saens demonstrates no less than 3 tcp/ip bugs in 2.2.3

Attachment: pgpx9mK7pl2_z.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: