Re: how to make Debian less fragile (long and philosophical)
Tuesday, August 17, 1999, 11:13:14 AM, Steve wrote:
> Reboots are bad, downtime is bad, the lack of remote access is bad, on
> production systems. I think this was already addressed multiple times.
And Debian is used in how many production machines? In how many desktop
machines?
The point, as I see it, is simple.
You want static binaries? Fine, compile them. There, you're done. But
in a *VAST* >>>MAJORITY<<< of cases, they are wasteful. Geez.
> can tell, there's a small disk space cost (about 200K per binary) and no
> memory cost. There was some grumbling about the effort involved, but I
> think that was without a full understanding of what was involved.
No memory cost? Care to rethink that again?
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reply to: