Re: Why is libgtk1.2-1.2.3-1 bloating dynamically linked binaries (was: Why is libc-2.1.*.so not stripped?)

To: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why is libgtk1.2-1.2.3-1 bloating dynamically linked binaries (was: Why is libc-2.1.*.so not stripped?)
From: Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org>
Date: 28 Jul 1999 21:17:50 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] yttbtcw6qdt.fsf@gilgamesh.cse.ucsc.edu>
In-reply-to: Marcus Brinkmann's message of "Wed, 28 Jul 1999 20:52:16 +0200"
References: <[🔎] E119EtS-0000Zu-00@night> <[🔎] yttd7xdhirm.fsf@gilgamesh.cse.ucsc.edu> <[🔎] 19990728205215.P389@ulysses.ulysses.de>

>>>>> "Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:

    Marcus> Gee, maintainers! Read TFMs :)

It turns out I had actually already had the code in there, I just had
forgotten to rebuild. :) 1.2.3-2 of glib and gtk have this fixed.

-- 
Brought to you by the letters K and Z and the number 18.
"I'm with insurance."
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer of Gimp and GTK+ -- http://www.debian.org/

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Why is libgtk1.2-1.2.3-1 bloating dynamically linked binaries (was: Why is libc-2.1.*.so not stripped?)
  - From: Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl>
- Re: Why is libgtk1.2-1.2.3-1 bloating dynamically linked binaries (was: Why is libc-2.1.*.so not stripped?)
  - From: Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org>
- Re: Why is libgtk1.2-1.2.3-1 bloating dynamically linked binaries (was: Why is libc-2.1.*.so not stripped?)
  - From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [New maintainer] Working for Debian and becoming a registered Debian developer
Next by Date: Re: Policy for default mount points?
Previous by thread: Re: Why is libgtk1.2-1.2.3-1 bloating dynamically linked binaries (was: Why is libc-2.1.*.so not stripped?)
Next by thread: ITP: ext2-resize and misc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread