[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ITP: cthugha

"Chris Karr" <br284@hotmail.com> writes:

> I am wondering one thing about this. It it a big fiasco if I were to take 
> the cthugha package and split it into three packages? The rationale being 
> that there are three binaries that come with a default cthugha package: an 
> SVGA, an X11, and a GL version. I was reading through the new maintainers 
> documentation (this will be my first package) and it suggested starting out 
> with single binary packages.

I don't think a multi-binary package like this is too bad, especially
with the help of debhelper.  What *is* more difficult is a library
package with corresponding -dev and -bin packages.

If you think it would work better, give it a try.

	 Carey Evans  http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/c.evans/

			 print [<>]->[rand$.]

Reply to: