Re: ITP: cthugha
"Chris Karr" <email@example.com> writes:
> I am wondering one thing about this. It it a big fiasco if I were to take
> the cthugha package and split it into three packages? The rationale being
> that there are three binaries that come with a default cthugha package: an
> SVGA, an X11, and a GL version. I was reading through the new maintainers
> documentation (this will be my first package) and it suggested starting out
> with single binary packages.
I don't think a multi-binary package like this is too bad, especially
with the help of debhelper. What *is* more difficult is a library
package with corresponding -dev and -bin packages.
If you think it would work better, give it a try.
Carey Evans http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/c.evans/