[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ash vs. bash



On Sat, Jul 24, 1999 at 09:39:47PM +0200, Carlo Strozzi wrote:
> I agree with you that unless someone make sure that all Debian system
> scripts use pure-bourne code it is probably better not to fiddle with
> /bin/sh, but that also means that upgrading bash _will_ have to reset
> the link, because otherwise something could break. Anyway, I think that

No. It is enough that /bin/sh exists; there is no reason for bash to go
messing with it. If I change it, the system should assume that I know
what I'm doing and shouldn't second guess me.

Mike Stone

Attachment: pgpuV2v5KhCd9.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: