On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 07:31:44PM -0500, Jeff Bachtel wrote: > Dreadfully sorry to jump in, but I was curious whether it was still the > standard to use pgp 2.6.3 instead of 5.0 for signed mail dealing with > debian development? > > The pages on becoming a debian developer indicate this is so, but I see a > few developers using versions of pgp that give 2.6.3i invalid packet > errors. > yes. Debian will switch to GPG at some point and some developers use that now to sign messages. There are no plans to switch to PGP 5.0 -- Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. ========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <gecko@benham.net> <>< * * -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------* * Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster * * <gecko@debian.org> <secretary@debian.org> <lintian-maint@debian.org> * * <webmaster@debian.org> <gecko@fortunet.com> <webmaster@spi-inc.org> * =========================================================================
Attachment:
pgptScDnUyZQ4.pgp
Description: PGP signature