On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 04:26:10PM -0700, Steve Lamb was heard to say: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, 22 Jun 1999 16:23:50 -0700 (PDT), Bradley Bell wrote: > > >neither does my mailer. I'm sorry steve, but your e-mail is cumbersome to > >read, so 90% of the time I just skip right on by. Does anybody have a > >patch to pinepgp to get it to read this format? > > I'm surprised there hasn't been a patch since PGP 5.0 has been out for > two years and it is fairly simple to either impliment or kludge past. If > you're not worried about my signature (most people really aren't other than > me) then just remove the HASH line and PGPPine will parse it and fail. > > You don't get the signature, but the upside is that you don't need to > jump through hoops to read it, either. > Erm, my mailreader (mutt) can handle pgp 5.0 but it shows your signature as plaintext. Am I confused here? (I've signed this message for comparison..) Daniel -- There are many of us in this old world of ours who hold that things break about even for all of us. I have observed, for example, that we all get about the same amount of ice. The rich get it in the summer and the poor get it in the winter. -- Bat Masterson
Attachment:
pgphX0Ewa29XT.pgp
Description: PGP signature