Dreadfully sorry to jump in, but I was curious whether it was still the
standard to use pgp 2.6.3 instead of 5.0 for signed mail dealing with
debian development?
The pages on becoming a debian developer indicate this is so, but I see a
few developers using versions of pgp that give 2.6.3i invalid packet
errors.
regards
jeff
> Erm, my mailreader (mutt) can handle pgp 5.0 but it shows your signature
> as plaintext. Am I confused here? (I've signed this message for comparison..)
>
> Daniel
--
Jeff Bachtel (NOC,CIS,TAMU) http://www.cepheid.nu/~jeff
[finger jeff@cepheid.nu for PGP key]
One is not superior merely because one sees the world as odious.
-- Chateaubriand (1768-1848)
Attachment:
pgpRapc9o2T_K.pgp
Description: PGP signature