Re: ITP: fdisk-pc9800

[Takao KAWAMURA <kawamura@ike.tottori-u.ac.jp>]

In message "Re: ITP: fdisk-pc9800"
    on 99/06/19, Chris Waters <xtifr@dsp.net> writes:
> Masato Taruishi <taru@debian.or.jp> writes:
> 
> > fdisk-pc9800 is tha package to partition a hard disk for NEC PC9800 series.
> 
> > Source: fdisk-pc9800
> > Section: base
> > Priority: standard
> 
> > I'm confused about `Priority:'... required or standard?
> 
> For a package that's only used by one particular class of machines?
> I'd say Priority: Extra.

You are right.
Mr.Taruishi, have you read Debian Policy Manual?

I think the priority value of another Mr.Taruishi's package
kernel-patch-2.2.9-pc9800 should be extra too, as
kernel-patch-2.2.9-powerpc and kernel-patch-2.2.10-i386.

But, the priority value of kernel-patch-2.0.35-alpha and
kernel-patch-2.0.36-m68k are optional.  Are they wrong?

-- 
Takao KAWAMURA