The Ugly Logo and the Consequences
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Now, what *will* happen when someone uses the `Official' (and very
beautiful!) logo in a context where only the `Open Use' (and almost
ugly) logo is allowed?
Really, I rarely seen something as stupid as this two logo idea (yes,
I kept my quiet until now... for two reasons: a) I'm not a developer,
so I ain't really got any say in this anyway, and b) I didn't expect
the two versions be as different (in beauty) as they now are).
And I'm even slightly annoyed with the whole concept of the `Official'
logo: AFAICS, it's mostly for people selling Debian stuff... and most
of those are pretty much parasites of the whole process.
Ouch, I guess them's fighting words... but from time to time I really
have the (uneasy) feeling that Debian is a little too concerned with
the well-being of the commercial (re-)distributors...
Bye, J
PS: Flame away... ;-)
- --
Jürgen A. Erhard eMail: jae@ilk.de phone: (GERMANY) 0721 27326
MARS: http://members.tripod.com/~Juergen_Erhard/mars_index.html
GNUstep - Free OPENSTEP (http://www.gnustep.org)
"Windows NT" is an acronym for "Windows? No thanks." -- Russ McManus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v0.9.7a (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjdZ/VcACgkQN0B+CS56qs2jAwCfT19eLZ+ibnZUiRQ0oSZGeazb
mUEAniJ/GXcfB/89yWpWni9xcu+ZQPuo
=4+QD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: