On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 02:16:37PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > The main thing I don't want to see change is the current "jargon" command. > I'm used to being able to type "jargon foo" and get to the definition of > foo. I don't really care if it continues to use info, or some other viewer, > just so long as the base command stays the same. It seems to easiest way to > manage that would be to use lynx (or sensible-browser if we get that) to > pull up the correct html file. Just as an aside, wouldn't a "dict foo" work if dictd had a jargon dictionary? -- Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. ========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <gecko@benham.net> <>< * * -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------* * Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster * * <gecko@debian.org> <secretary@debian.org> <lintian-maint@debian.org> * * <webmaster@debian.org> <gecko@fortunet.com> <webmaster@spi-inc.org> * =========================================================================
Attachment:
pgpqNqYMjj6MK.pgp
Description: PGP signature