[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: debhelper v2

On Tue, Apr 27, 1999 at 08:36:33PM +0100, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> [snip]
> > * dh_movefiles should use a name other than debian/<package>.files for the
> >   list of what to move, because it can't use debian/files for the first
> >   package, since that file is already used elsewhere. I'm thinking
> >   debian/<package>.move
> Mark me down as preferring move.<package> like someone else (I've just
> deleted the email). <package>.foo is uglier than foo.<package> IMHO.

I can see how it would seem ugly the other way too.  It really depends on
how you think.  I'm glad to know I'm not the only one with thought
patterns that foo.package works better, even in a ls..

Doesn't mean I expect we'll get it that way and it's not a huge problem
if we don't.  =>

Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>            Debian GNU/Linux developer
PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE            The Source Comes First!
<JHM> Being overloaded is the sign of a true Debian maintainer.

Attachment: pgpQF6GtxioE6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: