On Sun, Apr 25, 1999 at 04:13:17PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Daniel Martin <Daniel.Martin@jhu.edu> writes: > > > How about this as a start, then: > > > > Stage 1: Make it acceptable to have large number of things depend on > > libxml or libxmltok or some other xml parsing library - get perl's > > XML::Parser packaged if it isn't already. Perhaps this can be skipped > > if it takes too long; having many things use xml may cause this > > acceptance anyway. > > Well, I think we need have someone package XML::Parser at any rate. Hey, I'll volunteer for this, if no one has an objection to it... I'm always up for packaging stuff that's different than what I currently have (two single binary, one elisp, one documentation, and one Tcl/Tk script package that hopefully will make it into master, haven't heard anything back on it yet) so that I might learn, and considering the number of Perl module packages out there right now, it shouldn't be difficult to see how it's done, so I should have it out later tonight or tomorrow :) So, anyone object to me doing the work? I'll go ahead and start on it, anyway :) Thanks, Stevie -- Stevie Strickland | 325912 Georgia Tech Station sstrickl@resnet.gatech.edu | Georgia Institute of Technology http://computersprache.net/~sstrickl | Atlanta, GA 30332 Official Debian GNU/Linux Developer | Cyberlink/#Debian on IRC Member of the X Strike Force | PGP/GPG ID = 23A6D909/AE7637D9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PGP Key fingerprint = 84 52 C7 EA E6 DB A1 C5 6A C9 D6 B9 88 26 74 FC GPG Key fingerprint = 3062 4329 AA5C 6095 DB71 AF9A 2A5E C7DE AE76 37D9
Attachment:
pgpX8eHORQV4K.pgp
Description: PGP signature