[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Caldera installation - something Debian should learn



On Wed, Apr 21, 1999 at 12:49:01PM -0400, Steve Dunham wrote:
> > I think the case can be made that for novice users they don't need to
> > interact with the dpkg install questions.
> 
> Yup, this is the biggest problem with Debian - and it is why I'm very
> surprised that Corel chose to base their distro on Debian.  IMHO, Debian
> is a very poor choice to base a "user friendly" installation on,
> because you would have to rewrite the install scripts of half of the
> packages.

Which is something that we want to do anyway.


> > 3. Which X server to use. I believe the reason dpkg requires asking this is
> > because debian has a unique, and more secure, way of linking the
> > /usr/X11R6/bin/X to the X server through the /etc/X11/Xserver file. Couldn't
> > XF86Config be made more intelligent to automatically do this ?
> 
> Which X server to use, which window manager to use, what the default
> dictionary language should be, the name of the default irc server.
> All of these questions are asked multiple times during install.
> Moreover, the default profiles seem to install many unnecessary window
> managers, but they don't install all of the window managers. Compare
> Red Hat or OpenLinux, which probe your machine and install and
> configure the correct X server.

This could be taken care of by the configuration for X.  This is
currently just XF86Setup or xf86config so there's not a whole lot in
there but it could be changed (and IMO should be)  The X configuration
most certainly does need a serious overhaul.  =>

--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>            Debian GNU/Linux developer
PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE            The Source Comes First!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I did it just to piss you off.  :-P
        -- Branden Robinson in a message to debian-devel

Attachment: pgpiSCq1synM4.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: