Previously Torsten Landschoff wrote: > I think it is well worth it. But the way they write the info is simple and > bad. Indeed. I would *much* rather have a system that does only save detection (ie PCI and PnP scan) and simple skip everything else. That way I can be sure that my system doesn't crash during the detection. If people want non-safe detection it could be an option, but I really don't want to support that since we can never get that right anyway. > 1. we know how many tests we are running. This way we could just fill the file > with this much of null bytes. Then we can start writing at the beginning and > sync after each test but ONLY the file contents. Doesn't work, you can't only sync everything with Linux, not a single device or a single file. Wichert. -- ============================================================================== This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman. E-Mail: wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
Attachment:
pgpLdI3ybuQ4t.pgp
Description: PGP signature