On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 01:50:29AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > I think it is well worth it. But the way they write the info is simple and
> > bad.
>
> Indeed. I would *much* rather have a system that does only save
> detection (ie PCI and PnP scan) and simple skip everything else. That
> way I can be sure that my system doesn't crash during the detection. If
> people want non-safe detection it could be an option, but I really don't
> want to support that since we can never get that right anyway.
I tend to agree. I would want also some way to decide WHAT gets looked
for in the "unsafe" methods.
--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> Debian GNU/Linux developer
PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE The Source Comes First!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
<Chalky> gcc is the best compressor ever ported to linux. it can turn
12MB of kernel source (and that's .debbed) into a 500k kernel
Attachment:
pgpXioD_iYLUB.pgp
Description: PGP signature