Re: Perl 5.005 package
Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote:
> As I mentioned above, there is a need for the current Perl package to be
> name perl. dpkg has too many heartaches with it as well as it being
> rather inelegant. I don't want to have to go the gtk route with all the
> versions. A perl5.005 package will be available for when the perl
> package becomes 5.006.
>
> The only problem that I have is what will cause those people doing a
> partial upgrade to potato that upgrade perl to also install perl5.004?
> I really don't think we want a recommends or even a suggests. I guess
> we could just tell them what to do when they have problems.
You're relying on release notes when there's a clean solution. That's evil.
--
see shy jo
Reply to: