On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 09:05:14AM -0500, Steve Willer wrote: > > > Certainly not the only way possible to do this, but it's better than what > > we have now. Moving them outside of the tree as RMS suggests is not > > practical IMO. Neither is having "two versions" of Debian out there, one > > which is purely main and one which is not... > > Okay, perhaps another thought: skip the ftp reorganization and make the > vrms package part of the default installation sets. Perhaps also change > vrms to add a short essay about what the list means to the user (and also > how to remove the package if the user so desires). > > It's relatively painless to implement and doesn't add any significant > inconvenience to the user. It also makes the point. Doesn't it? "vrms"? -- Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> Debian GNU/Linux developer PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE The Source Comes First! To boldly go where no bunch of geeks have gone before :) --Joel Klecker
Attachment:
pgpQUHmCizTAv.pgp
Description: PGP signature