Re: KDE
Montreal Wed Mar 10 11:22:15 1999
Man, are you fast.
Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> > The sections have been clearly separated for a long time. In fact,
> > that's whole reason for the beginning of this thread: someone
> > complaining that certain software was not in main. I said, there was
> > no practical difference and almost everyone jumped on me for saying
> > that. Clearly there was a big difference in the minds of people.
>
> As there should be. There is a big difference.
>
> One is an official part of Debian. The other is a service we provide as a
> concession to the needs of our users, and the fact that there are still a
> few holes in the 'free arsenal' of software.
I agree and understand. This is my point. There is no need for any
more political games. People know the difference.
> Because, at this stage, we still wish to uphold the needs of our users in
> this.
>
> In fact, I personally would have no problem with ditching non-free
> completely. However, if other people want to do the work to see that it
> continues to exist, I don't have a problem with that.
Nothing needs to change.
-N.
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: KDE
- From: Navindra Umanee <navindra@cs.mcgill.ca>
- Re: KDE
- From: Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>