Re: FVWM 2.2 officially released
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 08:27:36PM +0100, Vincent Renardias wrote:
> > Uh, lots of people have used fvwm2 for some time, without problems,
> > but that doesn't mean that we need to ditch fvwm. Just leave it
> > alone, maybe... Or ask around and see if it is true that no one uses
> > it.
>
> Why should fvwm1 stay around? Each time version N of any Debian packaged
> software is out, this version is packaged and _replaces_ the version N-1
> in the Debian archive. This is how it works with every package. Why should
> it be any different with fvwm?!
Well, we do have asclassic....
Adam
Reply to: