Re: Release-critical Bugreport for February 16, 1999

["Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@efis.ucr.ac.cr>]

On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 02:43:51PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> The conflict is a bug, IMHO.

No, it's not.

> asclock refuses an afterstep which is <= 1.4.5.3-1 while the one in slink
> is precisely 1.4.5.3-1.

which precisely the one in hamm.  It's not like there wasn't enough time.  I
put the 'Conflicts' there for a reason.

> Since asclock is not in the master list, it's not a real problem for the
> boot-floppies package.

Uh? What's the master list?

I got a bug because asclock conflicts with afterstep and both packages are
installed by the "Workstation Std" configuration.  The configuration comes
from the boot floppies (or the base tarball, I dunno, it's the same thing,
isn't it?), so I guess the place to fix this is the boot floppies package.


							Marcelo