Re: RFC: new network config
In article <19990207155039.C18585@deadend.argh.org>,
Alexander Koch <email@example.com> wrote:
> word wrap or something anyway. Besides, what is the problem with
> Mike's approach. Bind configs are that way (and I *like* them),
> many of the inn[feed] configs are that way, it is some kind of
> standard (the braces at least) anyway..
Apparently bind 8, gated, &c. actually use a common library to parse
this stuff -- it is like Mike's example, except that newlines are not
significant delimiters (you need semicolons). It would not be a bad
idea to conform to this format, since it's likely to catch on and the
parser is already written.