Re: libpam, cracklib, and slink (was Re: Release-critical...)
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 04:50:53PM +0100, J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
> > Since no one else has spoken up, I will take over pam. I will also look
> > into cracklib support being put back in,
>
> You're misunderstanding things here: PAM so far has not supported cracklib.
> At one point, I was considering adding the support, and modified the build
> system to add -lcracklib for the pamutil .so's, but I never got around to
> really enabling the cracklib build.
That's fine, I wasn't too sure what the relation was so I wasn't about to
make any definite plans. If you have some detailed suggestions on this I
would appreciate them greatly. As for now, I'm simply going to
re-familiarize myself with the source and diff.
thanks,
Ben
--
----- -- - -------- --------- ---- ------- ----- - - --- --------
Ben Collins <b.m.collins@larc.nasa.gov> Debian GNU/Linux
UnixGroup Admin - Jordan Systems Inc. bcollins@debian.org
------ -- ----- - - ------- ------- -- The Choice of the GNU Generation
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: libpam, cracklib, and slink (was Re: Release-critical...)
- From: Ben Collins <bmc@it.larc.nasa.gov>
- Re: libpam, cracklib, and slink (was Re: Release-critical...)
- From: Ben Collins <bmc@visi.net>
- Re: libpam, cracklib, and slink (was Re: Release-critical...)
- From: Jean Pierre LeJacq <jplejacq@quoininc.com>
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport for January 19, 1999
- From: Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl>
- libpam, cracklib, and slink (was Re: Release-critical...)
- From: Chris Waters <xtifr@dsp.net>
- Re: libpam, cracklib, and slink (was Re: Release-critical...)
- From: "J.H.M. Dassen" <jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl>
- Re: libpam, cracklib, and slink (was Re: Release-critical...)
- From: "J.H.M. Dassen" <jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl>