Re: libpam, cracklib, and slink (was Re: Release-critical...)
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 10:34:45AM -0500, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
> > Ack! We need pam to be maintained if we want to enable it's use in
> > potato. I'll take it, if no one intends on doing so themselves.
>
> Another Ack! I'd like to see cracklib support enabled in PAM. Can we
> coordinate uploads here? I plan on a new upload of cracklib this
> weekend which will close all existing bug reports.
Since no one else has spoken up, I will take over pam. I will also look
into cracklib support being put back in, but for slink I think the
"Priority" conflict warrants the dependency being removed.
--
----- -- - -------- --------- ---- ------- ----- - - --- --------
Ben Collins <b.m.collins@larc.nasa.gov> Debian GNU/Linux
UnixGroup Admin - Jordan Systems Inc. bcollins@debian.org
------ -- ----- - - ------- ------- -- The Choice of the GNU Generation
Reply to: