Re: i

[Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>]

Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> wrote:
> I meant the second interpretation - mainly because short names are likely to
> be used by shell aliases or other customization. Or do you think that "B" is
> a very clever name for an executable ?

In this case, yes.  The same key sequence becomes meaningful in
a number of contexts.

> I don't know what the plan 9 operating system is. I don't understand
> if the package will break in some respect when you change the name of
> the binary (as you say one should rebuild the command language).

The package won't break if the executable is renamed or removed, it
will merely be less convenient.

-- 
Raul


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .