[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: isdnutils and 2.0.36

On Wed, Dec 16, 1998 at 06:03:05PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> If 2.0.36 goes in, I'd have to at least upload an isdnutils that is
> identical to the current slink one, but which conflicts with kernel
> 2.0.36, as that is simply not compatible.  This might be a good idea
> anyway, to prevent problems when people upgrade to a new kernel
> without upgrading the rest...  Would this be sufficient reason to
> allow an upgrade (of the current slink version)?

Great idea!! 

> Paul Slootman


Attachment: pgpRCJagQXRhq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: