Re: DPLs : what do you think about ...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
It seemed to me that you lumped #3 and #4 together in the possiblity of having
the package moved to wnpp for adoption. Mind you, I'm not saying it's a
totally bad idea, I worry a bit about package that have been abandoned w/o the
maintainer telling Debian (or Debian being abandoned by the person without us
being told) but I think a measure like that would require TIGHT controls...
maybe even some Real World(tm) action like a telephone call....
On 14-Dec-98 Ben Collins wrote:
> That is touchy, but you could think of it that if they are not there, an
> NMU is in the best interest of the stable distribution. Any person on
> vacation also (usually) states that bug fixing NMU's are acceptible while
> away. Any maintainer should be willing to understand the importance of the
> NMU to fix bugs while they were unable to do so.
>
=========================================================================
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* -------------------- * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ---------------*
* Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <gecko@benham.net> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++*
* KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- *
* Debian Developer * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++ DI+++ D++ *
* <gecko@debian.org> * G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+ *
* -------------------- * ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---------------*
=========================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNnRfo7bps1lIfUYBAQGLLQQAvNE5sjzwoVfV3NbWl/oSYvNcwX03+2ue
rPNY340kQAdjK3Psf4b05cyK/DWvZC5JAifyb3lv1URsNEBcaCOKjmTJc5kC0x2n
vB6lemWFZNBxB6acdnx2l+eCxMqsbtZe6bdVCtropemjVu49PQAftQvJUmhfD/aR
S2qvq1PbO58=
=77ZN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: