Re: Nomination question: Redhat
On Sun, Dec 13, 1998 at 03:25:41PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> The way your argument looks to me is "they have Alan Cox and we
> don't so they must have a better security tean." So they have Alan
> Cox working for them, I don't consider this a big deal.
>From what I have understood, the people involved in the 'linux
security audit' or whatever it is, are mostly working with redhat.
> As for Alan being more than a kernel hacker, what more is he? What
> makes him so special that the distribution that hired him is so much
> better than everyone else? He can code? A lot of people can code.
He's on a pretty close level to Linus, and has done a lot for linux
(big understatement).
--
David Welton http://www.efn.org/~davidw
Debian GNU/Linux - www.debian.org
Reply to: