Re: egcc maintainer

[Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>]

J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 13:47:53 +0100, joost@pc47.mpn.cp.philips.com wrote:
> > I don't very much like either of "Compiler maintenance group
> > <galenh-egcs@debian.org>" and "Enrique Zanardi <debian-boot...>" because
> > it does not structurally solve the problem it addresses. 
> > 
> > Instead, "Compiler maintenance group" <egcs@packages.debian.org> and
> > "Debian boot floppies team" <debian-boot@packages.debian.org> should be
> > used. 

I'm always in favour of the maintainer field pointing to a defined
and terminated group as core maintainers and a larger discussion
group associated to it.

> I agree that this would be a more pleasing solution. Currently the
> packages.debian.org address database is based on the maintainer addresses
> from the Packages file, so that would have to be changed. Joey?

What do you want me to change?  I can add overrides wherever you
like.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from.
	-- Andrew S. Tanenbaum

Please always Cc to me when answering on the lists.