Re: Packages compiled against GTK+1.1 <= 1.1.4 *MUST BE RECOMPILED*!
>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Bialasinski <martin@internet-treff.uni-koeln.de> writes:
BG> Any maintainer who has a package in this list must grab the
BG> new GLib and GTK+ from Incoming and recompile their packages
BG> for potato. You don't have to upload the fixed packages yet,
BG> as it's taking a little while for the new GLib and GTK+ to be
BG> accepted into the archives, but please do the recompile as
BG> soon as possible.
Martin> I'll do this for my xlogmaster, but I just downgraded
Martin> libc6, as there is no fixed libstdc++2.8 and without it,
Martin> soe important packages I need won't work.
Isn't there a fixed libstdc++2.8 in Incoming? I seem to recall
someone posting that..
Martin> I also fear to produce packages having the frame_info
Martin> problem, so I still wait for some clueful person to post a
Martin> list of packages one needs (or one has to avoid) in order
Martin> to produce proper binaries.
As long as one does not have libc6 2.0.7u-5, one will not produce
packages with the frame_info problem, as far as I know.
--
Brought to you by the letters A and J and the number 8.
"It is sad. *Campers* cannot *dance*. Not even a *party*." -- Orz, SCII
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.
Reply to: