Re: The time has come (part II) ...
On Wed, 25 Nov 1998, Eric Delaunay wrote:
> Christian Meder wrote:
> > 2.0.35 is pretty stable for me but it's not completely stable because the
> > virtual consoles die sometimes. 2.1.125 is much better but it has got the
> > X logout crash problem.
> About kernel, I will release the next bootdisks with 2.0.35. Is it enough
> reliable for *all* sparc workstations, or should I switch to 2.1 ?
Slightly off-topic, but a colleague of mine has been trying linux on a
sparcserver 5 and it has been giving major problems with the scsi bus.
The machine complains a lot and after a while just crashes on both 2.0.35
and any recent 2.1 kernel. Anyone familiar with that?