Re: The time has come (part II) ...

[joost@pc47.mpn.cp.philips.com]

On Wed, 25 Nov 1998, Eric Delaunay wrote:

> Christian Meder wrote:
> > 
> > 2.0.35 is pretty stable for me but it's not completely stable because the 
> > virtual consoles die sometimes. 2.1.125 is much better but it has got the
> > X logout crash problem.
> 
> About kernel, I will release the next bootdisks with 2.0.35.  Is it enough
> reliable for *all* sparc workstations, or should I switch to 2.1 ?

Hi,

Slightly off-topic, but a colleague of mine has been trying linux on a
sparcserver 5 and it has been giving major problems with the scsi bus.
The machine complains a lot and after a while just crashes on both 2.0.35
and any recent 2.1 kernel.  Anyone familiar with that?

Cheers,


Joost