Re: [firstname.lastname@example.org: gnumaniak 1.0]
On Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 16:56:50 -0500, Mitch Blevins wrote:
> Another thing about the gnumaniak package. Should this be packaged
> seperately, or should the maintainers of the Debian packages (filetils,
> diffutils, etc) be encouraged to just incorporate the new man pages
> into their packages.
The latter. And when the individual package maintainers are busy integrating
the new manpages, they can also easily forward them upstream.
J.H.M. Dassen | RUMOUR Believe all you hear. Your world may
jdassen@wi.LeidenUniv.nl | not be a better one than the one the blocks
| live in but it'll be a sight more vivid.
| - The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan