Ben Gertzfield wrote: > >>>>> "Ben" == Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu> writes: > > Tom> This sounds very useful! Are we going to package it somehow? > > Ben> The problem is that one of the license requirements (3c (?)) > Ben> puts it into non-free. > > Again, the DFSG can't really apply to documentation. Look at the Perl > FAQ; we'd have to put it in non-free if we applied the DFSG to > documentation. > > This has come up before :) Is this true about not applying to documentation? After a few emails, ragnar is convinced to modify his license 'for the good of gnumanity' ;) He is currently contacting his co-authors to run the idea by them. If this documentation-exemption is true, then I feel I've been lying to him by telling him he needs to change it to get it into main. -Mitch
Attachment:
pgptKvt3iVvsf.pgp
Description: PGP signature