[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [scoop@freshmeat.net: gnumaniak 1.0]



Another thing about the gnumaniak package.  Should this be packaged
seperately, or should the maintainers of the Debian packages (filetils,
diffutils, etc) be encouraged to just incorporate the new man pages
into their packages.

It's a big package that will rev when any of fileutils || diffutils ||
sh-utils || libtool || textutils goes up a revision.  Maybe it should be
broken into:
gnumaniak-fileutils
gnumaniak-diffutils
etc.

Thoughts?

-Mitch

Attachment: pgpZ9wydAUMvx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: