On Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 04:52:03PM +0100, luther@maxime.u-strasbg.fr wrote: > > Only if the QPL is compatible with the GPL; which it looks like it isn't. > > Ok that is another point, but i think if you are able to but Qt into main, you > can resort to the "library normally distributed with the system" clause of the > GPL. so the more important point is if yes or not we can distribute Qt in main > or not, independently of any KDE stuff or other GPL problem. I really do NOT want to rely on that. I'm sorry, but that point is really messy IMO. > I think Qt does not belong in main, but i am not sure if my interpretation of > the DFSG, point 6 is correct. I disagree.. It seems to fit in main with the new license, though the source patches being seperate patches I didn't consider a problem with compatibility. It MIGHT be, or it might not. That's a more serious in the case of KDE, though it is fine in the case of the DFSG in general. -- Show me the code or get out of my way.
Attachment:
pgpc3c0PkzUU3.pgp
Description: PGP signature