Re: binaries compiled on slink don't run anywhere else
On Mon, Nov 16, 1998 at 12:48:52PM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 1998, Michael Stone wrote:
>
> > Quoting Michael Meskes (meskes@usa.net):
> > > Since gcc 2.7.2.3 still is the official compiler I cannot see the problem.
> > > If libc was compiled with egcc this is not correct AFAIK.
> >
> > FWIW, the latest pre 2.1 libc's don't compile with our gcc--they want
> > egcs.
>
> I have had no problem building them with gcc.
Really? From libc/configure.in:
AC_CHECK_PROG_VER(CC, ${ac_tool_prefix}gcc ${ac_tool_prefix}cc, -v,
[version \([egcygnustp-]*[0-9.]*\)],
[egcs-2.9[1-9].*|egcs-2.90.2[789]|egcs-2.90.[3-9][0-9]|\
pgcc-2.9[1-9].*|pgcc-2.90.2[789]|pgcc-2.90.[3-9][0-9]|*2.8.[1-9]*|\
*2.9|*2.9.[0-9]*|cygnus-2.9[1-9].*],
critic_missing=t)
2.8.1 is the earliest version of gcc with which you'll be able to
configure it. And if you're using THAT, there's plenty of other
problems.
Dan
Reply to: