On Mon, 16 Nov 1998, Michael Stone wrote:
> Quoting Michael Meskes (meskes@usa.net):
> > Since gcc 2.7.2.3 still is the official compiler I cannot see the problem.
> > If libc was compiled with egcc this is not correct AFAIK.
>
> FWIW, the latest pre 2.1 libc's don't compile with our gcc--they want
> egcs.
I have had no problem building them with gcc.
The 2.0.7u was also built with gcc. The only problems I have known with
respect to egcs are caused when different libraries are built with
different compilers, or when some of the libraries linked with, are linked
against a different libc6 than the one used for the rest of the linking.
That is, these problems stem from "mixed" libraries.
Luck,
Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_- Author of "The Debian Linux User's Guide" _-_-_-_-_-_-
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (850) 656-9769
Flexible Software 11000 McCrackin Road
e-mail: dwarf@polaris.net Tallahassee, FL 32308
_-_-_-_-_-_- If you don't see what you want, just ask _-_-_-_-_-_-_-