Re: cc'ing (was Re: Mozilla goes GTK+ instead of Qt)
Steve> I didn't, just pointing out, again, what I pointed out before
Steve> (check the archives yourself) that the "problems" associated
Steve> with the reply-to being set are outweighed by people who don't
Steve> trim when it ISN'T set.
jeeeeezzuusss!!!
i can't believe it. not here too!?!
i thought people in debian-devel had a better class of clue than that.
setting the Reply-To: header on a mailing list is just plain fucking
stupid. it is brain-dead, and it is completely cretinous. it serves no
useful purpose and causes numerous problems.
in case nobody has posted the relevant url yet, here it is:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
craig
flame brought to you in the interests of knocking this stupid idea on the
head before it takes over. it's a perniciously dangerous meme.
--
craig sanders
Reply to: