On Wed, 21 Oct, 1998, Joey Hess wrote: > Thought those complaining of no dehacked support might find this useful. Any > other reasons to keep the old dosdoom around? any reason to remove it? i mean we have xemacs and gnu emacs, egc and gcc, gawk and mawk, nvi and vim and elvis. We defienatly need to go through deleting some of these duplicates. -- a=IO::Socket;perl -M$a -e$a'::INET->new(PeerAddr=>"host:139")->send(1,MSG_OOB)' -- winnuke in ONE line