> > Also I would prefer an alternative setup for these two packages with > > icewm-gnome getting the higher one. Or even divided into three: > > icewm-common, icewm-gnome, icewm-nognome. > This should be kept as `icewm' imho. Or we can bet on a Gnomeish future and have xxxxxxx.deb and xxxxx-nognome.deb packages....