On Sat, Oct 10, 1998 at 08:23:14PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > > There are those possibilities, but the lyx people will probably give > > permission for linking with libforms since they clearly intend for that to > > be done. The biggest problem with KDE was outside code that was ported and > > that the KDE people did not want to make the needed changes. Has anyone yet > > contacted the lyx people? > > Yes, me. Good, please let us know what you hear back. => > > This is not, I repeat -NOT- about whether or not we can replace KDE with > > Gnome or we can replace lyx with anything else. We should try to convince > > the lyx people to make the changes we need to allow us to keep lyx, just as > > we tried with KDE. > > Please read my statement. I never said this is about replacements. I just > said we should try to keep it because it is important IMO. Not that we > didn't try with KDE though. If I was able to imply it, the KDE people certainly would have. I don't want them to have any excuse for twisting words so they read what they want to read into them. > > I agreed that KDE needed to be removed because of the license problems, NOT > > because it was non-free code or anything so petty. > > No one said that. Good, glad that's clear to most sensable people now. =>
Attachment:
pgpZc4fTR4rj7.pgp
Description: PGP signature