Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]

To: kde-licensing@alpha.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de
Cc: agulbra@troll.no, cas@taz.net.au, kde-licensing@kde.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]
From: Alan Cox <alan@cymru.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 17:39:12 +0100 (BST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 199810101639.RAA12439@snowcrash.cymru.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.981010054904.22627A-100000@alpha.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> from "Martin Konold" at Oct 10, 98 05:52:30 am

> > The GPL'ed apps require that the work as a whole must be distributable
> > "under the terms of the GPL". Do you think that means that I have to
> > re-license the individual parts?
> 
> Will Debian remove Motif linked XEmacs from their ftp server?
> According to several Debian developers Motif is not a part of the OS.
>
> Will Debian remove LyX from their ftp server? 
> According to several Debian developers Xforms is not a DFSG compatible
> library.

Unless XForms and XEmacs work with Lesstif and the clone forms libraries
then I'd agree

Reply to:

References:
- Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]
  - From: Martin Konold <konold@alpha.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>

Prev by Date: Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]
Next by Date: Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]
Previous by thread: Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]
Next by thread: Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread