Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]
> files and libraries being linked together. Does that mean that you
> think Debian should convert libc and so on from the LGPL to the GPL in
> order to comply with the license of the GPL'd applications in main?
Arnt if you stuck to using facts you might be able to have a sensible
discussion
The combined work is GPL. Who cares. The LGPL permits an LGPL work to be
part of a GPL work, so from the view of a GPL'd ls, yes the dynamically
linked ls is a GPL item, and the libc in it is binding to that license,
but the libc on its own is not GPL its LGPL
This is first year intellectual property law stuff
Reply to: